Milling Equipments wear in mineral processing operation

In a mineral processing plant,the activities unavoidably result in wear. And wear costs money. Often lots of money. This is related to the structure of rock, ore or minerals, being crystals normally both hard and abrasive. The wear is especially much more in hard ore such as iron ore processing and gold ore processing plant.

Why wear at all?

Wear is caused by the normal rock stress forces

• Compression (1)

• Impaction (2)

• Shearing (3)

• Attrition (4)

in combination with mineral hardness and energy!

fig1.jpg

Wear in operation caused by

fig2.jpg

1.Wear by Compression

fig3.jpg

Metals and compression

Manganese steel: The first option for compression wear is manganese steel. This alloy has a very special property, being self hardening and self healing when exposed to large amounts of compression and impact energy.

Normal standard is a 14% Mn alloy which is first option in most crushing applications. 18 % Mn alloy is a harder but also a more brittle alloy used in applications where the rock is softer (limited self hardening) but very abrasive.

fig4.jpg

Restrictions:

When installed in applications without work hardening service life will be poor! The alloys of cast ”white iron” type (High-chrome and Ni- hard) shall be avoided in crushers submitted to heavy compression.

2.Wear by Impaction (high)

fig5.jpg

Metals and impaction

The metals can be classified as:

Manganese: Needs high impaction for self hardening. If impaction is getting lower and

sliding is increasing Manganese is not suitable.

High Chrome: Opposite to manganese, can take heavy sliding but is more fragile and therefore limited against impaction.

Ni-hard: Somewhere between the two materials above.

Cr-Mo: Used in grinding when High Crome is too brittle

Note! The use of chrome steel (less brittle than chrome iron) is increasing for liners, curtains and hammers.

fig6.jpg

3.Wear by Impaction (low)

fig7.jpg

Rubber and impaction

For low velocity impaction (material speed less than 7 m/s) SBR, styrene butadiene

rubber (60 ShA) is always the first choice and will give the best cost effectiveness.

The material is also very tolerant to material size and is excellent for use in grinding mills, dump trucks and primary hoppers.

Applications: Dump Trucks, Feeder hoppers, Transfer points, Grinding Mills, Slurry pumps

4.Wear by Sliding

fig8.jpg

Rubber and sliding

Natural rubber is an outstanding option for the sliding abrasion of small, hard and sharp particles. Also for wet conditions.

Restrictions:

If sliding speed is exceeding 7 m/s (dry applications) temperature can start to rise and cause damage. Besides temperature oil is always a threat.

Polyurethane and sliding

Best option for tough sliding applications when particle size is lower than 50 mm. Excellent in wet applications. Tolerant to chemicals and oil.

Restrictions:

Large sizes and high velocity might cause problems.

Ceramics and sliding

The natural choice when mission is too hard for the options above. Hardness, resistance to temperature and corrosion plus low weight gives a masterpiece for sliding. Al203 (Aluminium oxide) is the most cost-effective material.

Restrictions:

Impaction is dangerous for ceramics (cracking) and must be avoided. Combination ceramics + rubber is an option. Composition and quality can vary from supplier to supplier.

Wear Protection – Wear Products

fig9.jpg

Wear products – applications

fig10.jpg

Heavy Impact – Selection

fig11.jpg

Impact and Sliding – Selection (modules)

fig12.jpg

Impact and sliding – Selection (sheeting)

fig13.jpg

Sliding and build up – selection

fig14.jpg

Wear Protection – Wear Parts

Wear parts –Vibrating Screen

fig15.jpg

Wear parts – ball mills

fig16.jpg

Tumbling mill – lining components

fig17.jpg

Lifter bars – rubber and compound

fig18.jpg


Tumbling mill liners– material

fig19.jpg


your contact information